Less money is spent on hiring and training new employees.
Long-term employees are more productive, because they have gone through the first-year learning curve and have a better understanding of their roles and the company’s goals.
Tenured employees have improved expertise that they bring to the team and can share with newer, younger employees.
Having longer-term employees, with less attrition leads to improved communication and understanding of the needs of the team, resulting in improved motivation and better results.
Regularly when we work with clients, we find that the information which is gathered internally during exit interviews is not the “real” reason that employees quit.
What Is The Real Reason?
More than
of respondents told their company they were leaving for more hours or money.
Less than
of the time more hours or money was the only reason for them leaving.
Our team has uncovered Harassment, Abuse, Safety Violations, Human Resource Violations, and Poor and Toxic Leadership.
It’s much easier to say that you are leaving for better pay, or more hours.
“There is a strong norm against clear honest and critical feedback in most organizations.”
“96% of Fortune 500 companies conduct exit interviews.”
After conducting 136 exit interviews more than 70% of respondents told the company they were leaving for a FT job, more hours or more money.
After thoroughly conducting the interviews, here is the information we were able to flush out, that respondents were unwilling to share with their supervisors or HR department
The client engaged us to complete a random sampling of 10 out of 40 employees. The organization had been making changes to improve their culture and the Senior Leadership team was certain that the effect had trickled down as they had planned.
The average tenure of respondents was 7.5 years.
Tom Jezersek
President & COO
Pacific Western Transportation